Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Pass Guide - Study NetSec-Analyst Plan

Exams-boost regularly updates Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst (NetSec-Analyst) practice exam material to ensure that it keeps in line with the test. In the same way, Exams-boost provides a free demo before you purchase so that you may know the quality of the NetSec-Analyst dumps. Similarly, the Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst practice test creates an actual exam scenario on each and every step so that you may be well prepared before your actual NetSec-Analyst examination time. Hence, it saves you time and money. Exams-boost provides three months of free updates if you purchase the Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst questions and the content of the examination changes after that.

Before you decide to get the NetSec-Analyst exam certification, you may be attracted by the benefits of NetSec-Analyst credentials. Get certified by NetSec-Analyst certification means you have strong professional ability to deal with troubleshooting in the application. Besides, you will get promotion in your job career and obtain a higher salary. If you want to pass your Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Actual Test at first attempt, NetSec-Analyst pdf torrent is your best choice. The high pass rate of NetSec-Analyst vce dumps can give you surprise.

>> Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Pass Guide <<

Pass Guaranteed Quiz 2025 NetSec-Analyst: Updated Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Exam Pass Guide

To meet the different and specific versions of consumers, and find the greatest solution to help you review, we made three versions for you. Three versions of Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst prepare torrents available on our test platform, including PDF version, PC version and APP online version. The trait of the software version is very practical. It can simulate real test environment, you can feel the atmosphere of the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst exam in advance by the software version, and install the software version several times. PDF version of NetSec-Analyst Exam torrents is convenient to read and remember, it also can be printed into papers so that you are able to write some notes or highlight the emphasis. PC version of our NetSec-Analyst test braindumps only supports windows users and it is also one of our popular types to choose.

Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Sample Questions (Q144-Q149):

NEW QUESTION # 144
A Palo Alto Networks firewall configured with GlobalProtect VPN is experiencing an issue where remote users can establish a VPN connection but cannot access any internal network resources. Troubleshooting steps confirm that client-side routing is correct, and the VPN tunnel is established. The GlobalProtect gateway security policy logs show 'deny' actions with 'Application: incomplete' and 'Service: unknown-tcp'. Which combination of factors is most likely contributing to this problem?

A. The 'tunnel interface' for GlobalProtect is incorrectly assigned to a virtual router that does not have routes to the internal networks.
B. Incorrect source NAT configuration on the GlobalProtect security policy and a missing security zone for the VPN tunnel interface.
C. Certificate validation failure between the GlobalProtect client and the gateway, preventing session establishment beyond the initial handshake.
D. The GlobalProtect gateway is configured for SSL VPN but the client is attempting to connect via IPsec, leading to protocol mismatch and decryption failure.
E. Missing or incorrect security policy rules allowing traffic from the GlobalProtect tunnel zone to internal zones, combined with a 'Service: application-default' setting that is preventing proper App-ID classification initially.

Answer: E

Explanation:
The key indicators here are 'Application: incomplete' and 'Service: unknown-tcp' in the logs, along with established VPN but no resource access. This strongly suggests that while the tunnel is up, the security policy is denying the traffic. 'Application: incomplete' often occurs when the firewall cannot fully classify the application (e.g., due to a security policy dropping the initial packets, or 'application-default' service being too restrictive before App-ID completes). If the service is 'application-default' for a policy that's meant to pass traffic, and the initial packets don't match known application defaults, it can be dropped. The primary issue is a lack of an explicit allow policy from the GlobalProtect tunnel zone to the internal zones, and potentially the 'Service' field being too restrictive, preventing initial App-ID classification and thus leading to 'incomplete' and 'unknown-tcp' classifications before a proper App-ID can be determined. If the policy uses 'application-default' and the initial packets (e.g., DNS, authentication) don't conform to a known App-ID, it gets dropped, making the application 'incomplete'.

NEW QUESTION # 145
You are tasked with automating the deployment and management of DoS protection profiles on multiple Palo Alto Networks firewalls using the PAN-OS API. A new DoS protection profile, 'Sensitive_APl DOS', needs to be created that applies 'Packet Based Attack Protection' for UDP floods (activation-rate 10000, alarm-rate 5000, action drop) and 'Session Based Attack Protection' for Max Concurrent Sessions (activation-rate 20000, alarm-rate 10000, action protect), with 'group-by source-ip'. Which of the following API calls, using an appropriate XML payload, would correctly create this profile? (Assume correct authentication and URL for the API endpoint).

A.
B.
C.
D.
E. None of the above correctly constructs the DoS Protection Profile for the PAN-OS API.

Answer: C

Explanation:
To correctly create a DoS Protection Profile via the PAN-OS API, the XML structure must accurately reflect the firewall's configuration hierarchy. 1 . XPath: The correct XPath for a DoS Protection Profile is

which is typically required. 2. XML Payload Structure: A DoS Protection Profile directly contains the 'group-by' and 'thresholds' elements. The 'thresholds' element then contains 'packet-based-attack-protection' and 'session-based-attack-protection'. Option A places 'packet-based...' and 'session-based...' directly under the profile entry, missing the and elements at the correct level. Option B has an incorrect XPath and wraps the entire definition under a which is not how a profile is defined directly. Option C correctly places and directly under the profile entry, and then structures the flood protections correctly under . This matches the typical PAN-OS configuration structure for a DoS protection profile. Option D's payload structure is also incorrect as it places and directly under the profile entry, without the wrapper. Therefore, Option C provides the most accurate XML payload and XPath for creating the specified DoS protection profile.

NEW QUESTION # 146
A large enterprise has implemented GlobalProtect and is leveraging Host Information Profile (HIP) for endpoint compliance. A new compliance requirement dictates that no user should be able to access the internal 'Sensitive SharePoint' site unless their device has the latest antivirus definitions and the endpoint security agent is running. All other internal resources should remain accessible even if the HIP check fails, but without the 'Sensitive SharePoint' access. Describe the policy configuration strategy to achieve this granular access control.

A. Create two Security Policy rules. Rule 1 (higher priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: AV UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: allow. Rule 2 (lower priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: NOT AV_UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: deny. Subsequent rules would then allow other internal access.
B. Create two Security Policy rules. Rule 1 (higher priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: AV_UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: allow. Rule 2 (lower priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: any, Application: any, Action: allow.
C. Create three Security Policy rules. Rule 1 (highest priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: AV UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: allow. Rule 2 (middle priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: any, Application: any, Action: allow. Rule 3 (lowest priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: deny (implicit). This strategy is flawed.
D. Create a single Security Policy rule: Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: AV_UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: allow. All other traffic is implicitly allowed.
E. Create two Security Policy rules. Rule 1 (higher priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source User: any, Source HIP Profile: AV_UpToDate_Running_Agent, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: sharepoint-base, Action: allow. Rule 2 (lower priority): Source Zone: Trust, Source Address: any, Source IJser: any, Destination Zone: Trust, Destination Address: NOT Sensitive_SharePoint_lP, Application: any, Action: allow.

Answer: E

Explanation:
Option D correctly addresses the requirement. The first rule explicitly allows access to 'Sensitive_SharePoint' ONLY if the HIP profile matches the compliance criteria. The second rule, with lower priority, then allows all other internal access (to destinations NOT the Sensitive_SharePoint_lP) for any user, regardless of their HIP status. This ensures that the compliant access is prioritized, and other general access remains available without blocking. Option B is incorrect because Rule 2 would allow access to Sensitive_SharePoint even without the HIP check. Option C is overly complex and might lead to unintended blocks. Option A would block all other internal access. Option E has a flawed implicit deny and is not the most direct way to achieve the goal.

NEW QUESTION # 147
An organization is migrating its cloud applications from a public internet connection to a dedicated AWS Direct Connect link through a Palo Alto Networks firewall. To achieve this, all traffic to AWS public IP ranges (e.g., EC2, S3) from the internal network must be forwarded over the Direct Connect interface (ethernet1/3) with a specific next-hop router. Other internet-bound traffic should continue using the primary internet uplink (ethernet1/1 ). Which of the following PBF actions are critical to ensure that if the Direct Connect link fails, the AWS-bound traffic automatically fails over to the primary internet uplink without manual intervention?

A. Configure a PBF rule with 'Action: Forward', 'Egress Interface: ethernet1/3', 'Next Hop: AWS Router_IP', and then create a second PBF rule with a higher priority for the same AWS destinations pointing to ethernet1/1 , which will only activate manually.
B. Create a PBF rule with 'Action: Forward', 'Egress Interface: ethernet1/3', 'Next Hop: AWS_Router_IP', and specify 'Fall back to: Yes' with the primary internet uplink's virtual router and next-hop.
C. Implement an ECMP route for the AWS public IP ranges, distributing traffic between ethernet1/3 and ethernet1/1 based on load.
D. Set up a static route for the AWS ranges with ethernet1/3 as the next hop, and configure BIDirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) on the Direct Connect interface.
E. Configure a PBF rule with 'Action: Forward', 'Egress Interface: ethernet1/3', 'Next Hop: AWS_Router_IP', and enable 'Monitor Link Group' for ethernet1/3 to trigger a route removal.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks PBF rules have a built-in 'Fall back to' option specifically for high availability. When configured, if the primary egress interface or next-hop specified in the PBF rule becomes unreachable (based on link monitoring or ARP/Ping monitoring), the traffic matching that rule will automatically fall back to the specified alternative forwarding method (e.g., default route, specific virtual router, or specific next hop). Option A describes link monitoring but not the automatic fallback PBF feature. Option C is for load balancing, not active-passive failover in this context. Option D requires manual intervention and doesn't leverage the PBF fallback mechanism. Option E describes general routing failover, but PBF provides a more granular, policy-based failover specific to the steered traffic.

NEW QUESTION # 148
Consider a large enterprise using Panorama for managing over 500 Palo Alto Networks firewalls. The security operations team frequently needs to deploy emergency security policy updates, which involve adding new URL filtering categories and threat prevention profiles to a subset of firewalls. Due to the critical nature, these updates must be atomic and reversible. Which of the following strategies, leveraging Panorama's folder and snippet capabilities, would best meet these requirements while minimizing downtime and human error?

A. Create a 'Shared Emergency Snippet' containing the required URL filtering and threat profiles. Apply this snippet to the relevant Device Groups as a 'Shared' policy rule. To revert, remove the shared snippet reference from the policy rule.
B. Create a new 'Emergency Policies' folder at a lower hierarchical level. Place the emergency policies within this folder and push. To revert, disable or delete the policies within this folder and re-push. This approach can utilize a 'pre-rule' or 'post-rule' structure within the device group.
C. Use a Python script with the Panorama API to programmatically add and remove the emergency policies. Store the policy definitions as code (snippets) in a version control system.
D. Export the configuration of affected firewalls, modify the XML to include the emergency rules, and re-import. To revert, re-import the original XML.
E. Manually create new policy rules in each affected Device Group and then commit and push. To revert, manually remove them.

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
Options B and C offer the most robust solutions. Option B leverages Panorama's built-in folder hierarchy and policy rule ordering. Creating a dedicated 'Emergency Policies' folder allows for centralized management of these rules. By placing these rules at an appropriate position (e.g., as 'pre-rules' or specific numbered rules) within the device group's policy set, they can be easily activated or deactivated as a group. This makes the update atomic and reversible by simply disabling/deleting the rules within that folder. Option C, using a Python script with the Panorama API, offers the highest level of automation, atomicity, and reversibility by integrating with a version control system. This allows for 'infrastructure as code' for security policies, making rollbacks precise and fast. Option A is manual and prone to errors. Option D is cumbersome and risky. Option E is less flexible for dynamic policy changes and may not be truly atomic or easily reversible as 'shared snippets' are for objects, not entire policy rules.

NEW QUESTION # 149
......

The number of questions of the NetSec-Analyst study materials you have done has a great influence on your passing rate. As for our study materials, we have prepared abundant exercises for you to do. You can take part in the real NetSec-Analyst exam after you have memorized all questions and answers accurately. Also, we just pick out the most important knowledge to learn. Through large numbers of practices, you will soon master the core knowledge of the NetSec-Analyst Exam. It is important to review the questions you always choose mistakenly. You should concentrate on finishing all exercises once you are determined to pass the NetSec-Analyst exam.

Study NetSec-Analyst Plan: https://www.exams-boost.com/NetSec-Analyst-valid-materials.html

With constant practice, users will find that feedback reports are getting better, because users spend enough time on our NetSec-Analyst test prep, Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Pass Guide How can we pass exam at first shot, Are you ready to take control of your future and achieve the scores you want to get in the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst (NetSec-Analyst) certification exam, Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Pass Guide They even felt a headache when they read a book.

Brett is man of many talents and interests, and whatever he ends up NetSec-Analyst doing we're sure it will be anchors aweigh, and that the Force will be with him, A familiarity with agile principles is helpful.

2025 Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst –Professional Exam Pass Guide

With constant practice, users will find that feedback reports are getting better, because users spend enough time on our NetSec-Analyst Test Prep, How can we pass exam at first shot?

Are you ready to take control of your future and achieve the scores you want to get in the Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst (NetSec-Analyst) certification exam, They even felt a headache when they read a book.

In addition, the intelligence and interactive of Online test engine of NetSec-Analyst training materials will make your study customizable.

Leo Wright Leo Wright

Biography

Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst Exam Pass Guide - Study NetSec-Analyst Plan

Pass Guaranteed Quiz 2025 NetSec-Analyst: Updated Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Exam Pass Guide

Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst Sample Questions (Q144-Q149):

2025 Palo Alto Networks NetSec-Analyst: Palo Alto Networks Network Security Analyst –Professional Exam Pass Guide

Archives