Kostenlose gültige Prüfung The Open Group OGEA-102 Sammlung - Examcollection

P.S. Kostenlose 2025 The Open Group OGEA-102 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von ZertPruefung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WZPtlEh2oGASz5ceTYHBele1aiRyNL6w

Schulungsunterlagen zur The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung von ZertPruefung sind effizient, die von manchen Experten und einigen bestandenen Kandidaten bewiesen sind. Sie sind fast gleich wie die echten OGEA-102 Prüfungsfragen. Sie können Ihnen dabei helfen, die OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen. Wir werden Ihnen alle Ihren bezahlten Summe zurückgeben, entweder Sie die OGEA-102 Prüfung nicht bestehen, oder die Testaufgaben von The Open Group OGEA-102 irgend ein Qualitätsproblem haben. Vertrauen Sie bitte auf ZertPruefung, denn wir werden Ihnen stets begleiten.

Wenn Sie die The Open Group OGEA-102 nicht bestehen, nachdem Sie unsere Unterlagen gekauft hat, bieten wir eine volle Rückerstattung. Diese Versprechung bedeutet nicht, dass wir nicht unserer The Open Group OGEA-102 Software nicht zutrauen, sondern unsere herzliche und verantwortungsvolle Einstellung, weil wir die Kunden sorgenfrei lassen wollen. Mit professionelle The Open Group OGEA-102 Prüfungssoftware und der nach wie vor freundliche Kundendienst hoffen wir, dass Sie sich keine Sorge machen.

>> OGEA-102 Online Prüfung <<

OGEA-102 Übungstest: TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam & OGEA-102 Braindumps Prüfung

Jetzt ist die The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung die beliebteste Zertifizierungsprüfung, an der viele IT-Fachleute beteiligen wollen. Dies ist ein Beweis für die IT-Fähigkeiten. Um die Prüfung zu bestehen sind umfangreiche Fachkenntnisse und Erfahrungen erfordert. Und das braucht doch viel Zeit. Vielleicht wählen Sie Ausbildungskurse oder Prüfungsmaterialien. Es ist eher kostengünstig, ein Ausbildungsinstitut von guter Qualität zu wählen. ZertPruefung ist eine Website, die die Bedürfnisse der IT-Fachleute zur The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung abdecken können. Die Produkte von ZertPruefung sind ziegerichtete Ausbildung zur The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung. Sie können in kurzer Zeit ihre IT-Fachkenntnisse ergänzen und sich gut auf die The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten.

The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam OGEA-102 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q17-Q22):

17. Frage
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a senior architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a medium-sized company with 400 employees. The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is their major asset and is highly confidential.
The company employees travel extensively for work and must communicate over public infrastructure using message encryption, VPNs, and other standard safeguards. The company has invested in cybersecurity awareness training for all its staff. However, it is recognized that even with good education as well as system security, there is a dependency on third-parly suppliers of infrastructure and software.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The CTO is the sponsor of the activity.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education, and support, it is likely just a matter of time before the company suffers a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their information assets.
A risk assessment has been done and the company has sought cyber insurance that includes ransomware coverage. The quotation for this insurance is hugely expensive. The CTO has recently read a survey that stated that one in four organizations paying ransoms were still unable to recover their data, while nearly as many were able to recover the data without paying a ransom. The CTO has concluded that taking out cyber insurance in case they need to pay a ransom is not an option.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to improve the resilience of the current architecture?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's resilience to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.
B. You would determine business continuity requirements, and undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request. You would manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved you would produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change.
C. You would monitor for technology changes from your existing suppliers that could improve resilience. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
D. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Business continuity is the ability of an organization to maintain essential functions during and after a disaster or disruption. Business continuity requirements are the specifications and criteria that define the acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in the event of a disaster or disruption. A gap analysis is a technique that compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state, and identifies the gaps or differences that need to be addressed. A change request is a formal proposal for an amendment to some product or system, such as the architecture. A Request for Architecture Work is a document that describes the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of an architecture project123 The best answer is A, because it describes the steps that would improve the resilience of the current architecture, which is the ability to withstand and recover from a ransomware attack or any other disruption. The steps are:
Determine the business continuity requirements, which specify the minimum acceptable level of performance and availability of the business processes and services in case of a ransomware attack. This would involve identifying the critical business functions, the recovery time objectives, the recovery point objectives, and the dependencies and resources needed for recovery.
Undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture, which compares the current state of the architecture with the desired state based on the business continuity requirements. This would involve assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the current architecture, the risks and opportunities for improvement, and the gaps or differences that need to be addressed.
Make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request. This would involve proposing solutions and alternatives to close the gaps, enhance the resilience, and mitigate the risks of the current architecture. The change request would document the rationale, scope, impact, and benefits of the proposed changes, and seek approval from the relevant stakeholders.
Manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. The Architecture Board is a governance body that oversees the architecture work and ensures compliance with the architecture principles, standards, and goals. The meeting would involve presenting the change request, discussing the pros and cons, resolving any issues or conflicts, and obtaining the approval or rejection of the change request.
Once approved, produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change. The Request for Architecture Work would describe the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of the architecture project that would implement the approved change request. The Request for Architecture Work would initiate a new cycle of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 33: Business Scenarios 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Gap Analysis 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 31: Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 34: Business Transformation Readiness Assessment : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 30: Gap Analysis : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 31: Architecture Change Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part VI: Architecture Capability Framework, Chapter 50: Architecture Governance : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 7: Request for Architecture Work

18. Frage
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a multinational energy company. The company is committed to becoming a net-zero emissions energy business by 2050. To achieve this, the company is focusing on shifting to renewable energy production and adopting eco-friendly practices.
The EA team, which reports to the Chief Technical Officer (CTO), has been tasked with overseeing the transformation to make the company more effective through acquisitions. The company plans to fully integrate these acquisitions, including merging operations and systems.
To address the integration challenges, the EA team leader wants to know how to manage risks and ensure that the company succeeds with the proposed changes. Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

A. The EA team should evaluate the company's readiness for change by identifying factors that will impact the transformation. These factors will be used to determine initial risks associated with the initiative.
B. The EA team should develop Business Architecture views that demonstrate how stakeholder concerns are addressed and assess each factor for readiness, urgency, and degree of difficulty.
C. The EA team should document the risks associated with the transformation in an Implementation Factor Catalog to inform decisions during implementation and deployment.
D. The EA team should create a Business Scenario to fully describe the business problem that is being addressed by the transformation. Once requirements are identified, they should be evaluated in terms of risks. Any residual risks should be escalated to the Architecture Board.

Antwort: D

Begründung:
In TOGAF, creating a Business Scenario is a foundational step in defining and understanding the business problem, especially for complex transformations involving multiple stakeholders and systems, such as in this scenario. This method aligns with Phase A (Architecture Vision) of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM). Here's why this approach is the most effective:
Understanding Business Requirements:
A Business Scenario provides a structured way to capture and analyze the business requirements, stakeholder concerns, and the contextual elements related to the problem. In this scenario, the company faces challenges in integrating newly acquired companies with existing operations, which includes complex stakeholder concerns across different functional areas. Developing a Business Scenario allows the EA team to break down these complexities into identifiable and manageable parts.
Risk Evaluation and Management:
By using the Business Scenario approach, the EA team can not only define the requirements but also assess associated risks systematically. TOGAF emphasizes the importance of risk management through identifying potential risks, evaluating their impact, and defining strategies for handling these risks. The process includes assessing how risks can be avoided, transferred, or reduced-a necessary step in large-scale transformations to ensure that risks are proactively managed.
Residual Risks and Governance:
Any risks that cannot be fully resolved should be identified as residual risks and escalated to the Architecture Board, which is aligned with TOGAF's governance approach. The Architecture Board's role in TOGAF is to provide oversight and make critical decisions on risks that exceed the control of the EA team. This ensures that unresolved risks are managed at the appropriate level of the organization.
Alignment with TOGAF ADM Phases:
The Business Scenario approach directly aligns with the Preliminary and Architecture Vision phases of the TOGAF ADM, which focuses on establishing a baseline understanding of the business context and the strategic transformation required. The detailed understanding of requirements, stakeholder concerns, and risks identified here will guide the subsequent phases of the ADM, including Business Architecture and Information Systems Architecture.
TOGAF Reference (Section 2.6, ADM Techniques):
TOGAF provides guidelines on the creation of Business Scenarios as part of ADM Techniques, highlighting the importance of defining a business problem comprehensively to ensure successful transformation. This method includes identification of stakeholders, business requirements, and associated risks, which aligns well with the company's need for strategic and systematic integration of new business units.
By utilizing a Business Scenario, the EA team ensures that all aspects of the transformation are well understood, risks are identified early, and residual risks are managed effectively, aligning with the company's strategic objectives and the TOGAF framework's guidance on risk management and stakeholder alignment.

19. Frage
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect in a multinational automotive manufacturer.
The company has a corporate strategy that focuses on electrification of its portfolio, and it has invested heavily in a new shared car platform to use across all its brands. The company has four manufacturing facilities, one in North America, two in Europe, and one in Asia.
A challenge that the company is facing is to scale up the number of vehicles coming off the production line to meet customer demand, while maintaining quality. There are significant supply chain shortages for electronic components, which are impacting production. In response to this the company has taken on new suppliers and has also taken design and production of the battery pack in-house.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice. The TOGAF standard is used for developing the process and systems used to design, manufacture, and test the battery pack. The Chief Information Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.
As part of putting the new battery pack into production, adjustments to the assembly processes need to be made. A pilot project has been completed at a single location. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, and the Architecture Board have approved the plan for implementation and migration at each plant.
Draft Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement and deploy the new processes for each location. The company mixes internal teams with a few third-party contractors at the locations. The Chief Engineer has expressed concern that the deployment will not be consistent and of acceptable quality.
Refer to the scenario
The Lead Enterprise Architect has asked you to review the draft Architecture Contracts and recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

A. For changes undertaken by internal teams, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. If a contract is issued to a contractor, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. If a deviation from the Architecture Contract is found, you recommend that the Architecture Board grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.
B. You recommend that the Architecture Contracts be used to manage the architecture governance processes across the locations. You recommend deployment of monitoring tools to assess the performance of each completed battery pack at each location and develop change requirements if necessary. If a deviation from the contract is detected, the Architecture Board should allow the Architecture Contract to be modified meet the local needs. In such cases they should issue a new Request for Architecture Work to implement a modification to the Architecture Definition.
C. You review the contracts ensuring that they address project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. Third-party contracts must be legally enforceable. You recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the process to be customized for local needs.
D. For changes requested by an internal team, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. For contracts issued to third- party contractors, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
According to the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, an Architecture Contract is a joint agreement between development partners and sponsors on the deliverables, quality, and fitness-for-purpose of an architecture1. It defines the scope, responsibilities, and governance of the architecture work, and ensures the alignment and compliance of the architecture with the business goals and objectives1.
In the scenario, the Lead Enterprise Architect has asked you to review the draft Architecture Contracts and recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern about the consistency and quality of the deployment of the new processes for the battery pack production at each location.
The best answer is C, because it follows the guidelines and best practices for defining and using Architecture Contracts as described in the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.22. It ensures that the contracts cover the essential aspects of the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management, and that they are legally enforceable for third-party contractors. It also recommends a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process, and a mechanism for handling any deviations from the Architecture Contract, involving the Architecture Board and the possibility of granting a dispensation to allow the process to be customized for local needs.
The other options are not correct because they either23:
A . For changes requested by an internal team, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. For contracts issued to third-party contractors, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. You recommend that the Architecture Board reviews all deviations from the Architecture Contract and considers whether to grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.: This option does not address the need to review the contracts to ensure that they address the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. It also does not recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. Moreover, it suggests that a memorandum of understanding is sufficient for internal teams, which may not be legally binding or enforceable.
B . For changes undertaken by internal teams, you recommend a memorandum of understanding between the Architecture Board and the implementation organization. If a contract is issued to a contractor, you recommend that it is a fully enforceable legal contract. If a deviation from the Architecture Contract is found, you recommend that the Architecture Board grant a dispensation to allow the implementation organization to customize the process to meet their local needs.: This option has the same problems as option A, and also implies that the Architecture Board should always grant a dispensation for any deviation, which may not be appropriate or desirable in some cases.
D . You recommend that the Architecture Contracts be used to manage the architecture governance processes across the locations. You recommend deployment of monitoring tools to assess the performance of each completed battery pack at each location and develop change requirements if necessary. If a deviation from the contract is detected, the Architecture Board should allow the Architecture Contract to be modified meet the local needs. In such cases they should issue a new Request for Architecture Work.: This option does not address the need to review the contracts to ensure that they address the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management. It also does not recommend a schedule of compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process. Moreover, it suggests that the Architecture Board should always allow the Architecture Contract to be modified for any deviation, which may not be appropriate or desirable in some cases. It also implies that a new Request for Architecture Work should be issued for each deviation, which may not be necessary or feasible.
Reference:
1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 3: Definitions and Terminology, Section 3.1: Terms and Definitions
2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 43: Architecture Contracts
3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 44: Architecture Governance

20. Frage
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
Your role is that of a senior architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a medium-sized company with 400 employees. The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is their major asset and is highly confidential.
The company employees travel extensively for work and must communicate over public infrastructure using message encryption, VPNs, and other standard safeguards. The company has invested in cybersecurity awareness training for all its staff. However, it is recognized that even with good education as well as system security, there is a dependency on third-parly suppliers of infrastructure and software.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The CTO is the sponsor of the activity.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education, and support, it is likely just a matter of time before the company suffers a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their information assets.
A risk assessment has been done and the company has sought cyber insurance that includes ransomware coverage. The quotation for this insurance is hugely expensive. The CTO has recently read a survey that stated that one in four organizations paying ransoms were still unable to recover their data, while nearly as many were able to recover the data without paying a ransom. The CTO has concluded that taking out cyber insurance in case they need to pay a ransom is not an option.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to improve the resilience of the current architecture?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's resilience to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.
B. You would determine business continuity requirements, and undertake a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would make recommendations for change requirements to address the situation and create a change request. You would manage a meeting of the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved you would produce a new Request for Architecture Work to activate an ADM cycle to carry out a project to define the change.
C. You would monitor for technology changes from your existing suppliers that could improve resilience. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
D. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.

Antwort: B

21. Frage
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within a healthcare and life science company. The company is a leading player in its industry, dedicated to transforming healthcare with new ideas and advancements. The company has multiple divisions that cover different aspects of the business.
The company's Enterprise Architecture (EA) department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes following the TOGAF Standard. In addition to the EA program, the company has a number of management frameworks in use.
The Architecture Board includes representatives from each division of the company.
Many of the company's rivals have begun utilizing Artificial Intelligence (Al) in their operations, and the indications are that this will be transformative for healthcare delivery. This is something the EA department has been interested in for a while, and they had recently submitted an architecture Change Request which was approved. As a result, the CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to investigate the implementation of Al in the company.
Areas for evaluation include:
How can staff use Al daily in their current role?
How Al can enhance access to care for patients, and how to make that experience seamless?
How Al can offer new workplace platforms and tools to increase efficiency?
Some of the top managers are worried about a change in the way of working, and if it will achieve the goals.
Many are not confident that the company's risk management processes are adequate for a company-wide integration of generative Al. There are also questions from staff about whether enough specific guidelines and polices have been put in place for responsible use of Al.
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has actively encouraged architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.
The CIO wants to know how to address these concerns and reduce risks.
Refer to the scenario
You have been tasked with starting the architecture development. How do you begin?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

A. You recommend that a Communications Plan be created to address the key stakeholders, that is the most powerful and influential partners. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture with respect to each location and reflects the stakeholders' requirements.
You will check with each key stakeholder that their concerns are being addressed. Risk mitigation should be explicitly addressed as a component of the architecture being developed.
B. You recommend creation of a set of business models that can be applied uniformly across all Al- related architecture projects. These should be developed in the portable format to ensure maximum portability across the many tools used in the firm. Each architecture should then be defined based on this fixed set of models. All concerned parties can then examine the models to ensure that their needs have been addressed.
C. You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken. This will allow the architects to define groups of partners (the stakeholders) who have common concerns and include development of a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. To mitigate risk, you include a requirement that there be progressive development of the target architecture to ensure there is regular feedback.
D. You recommend that models be created for the Draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology Architectures. These can be used to ensure that the system will be compliant with the local regulations for each division. Together with the problem description, and requirements, this ensures that all the necessary data and detail is addressed. A formal review should be held with the stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been properly addressed by the models.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Key aspects of the scenario:
Objective:
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into healthcare delivery, with a focus on improving patient care, enhancing workplace efficiency, and enabling seamless experiences.
Challenges:
Stakeholder concerns about risk management, adaptability to change, and ensuring alignment with regulations and policies.
Addressing the concerns of staff and top management about AI integration and achieving the desired goals.
CIO's Perspective:
Encouraging an agile approach to architecture development.
Addressing risks and ensuring stakeholder concerns are managed.
Areas for Evaluation:
AI usage by staff and impact on workflows.
Patient experience enhancement via AI.
New workplace platforms and tools powered by AI.
Option Analysis:
Option 1: Analysis of stakeholders and development of a Stakeholder Map Pros:
Stakeholder analysis is critical for identifying concerns, viewpoints, and requirements.
TOGAF emphasizes stakeholder engagement early in the process to mitigate risks and align expectations.
Developing a Stakeholder Map ensures clear alignment with their interests and creates a foundation for regular feedback loops.
Cons:
Does not explicitly address the creation of architecture models or policies upfront.
Option 2: Creation of a Communications Plan
Pros:
A communications plan fosters effective stakeholder engagement by addressing their concerns and ensuring transparent reporting.
Risk mitigation as part of communication aligns with TOGAF's stakeholder management practices.
Cons:
This focuses more on communication mechanics rather than advancing architectural development directly.
Option 3: Models for Draft Business, Data, Application, and Technology Architectures Pros:
Aligns with the Architecture Development Method (ADM), ensuring compliance with requirements and regulations.
Helps formalize stakeholder feedback by verifying their concerns against tangible models.
Cons:
Developing detailed models early on may delay immediate resolution of stakeholder concerns and risk mitigation.
Option 4: Set of reusable business models for AI-related projects
Pros:
Standardized models ensure consistency and portability across the organization's AI-related efforts.
Cons:
Too narrow in focus for the initial architecture development phase; does not address risk management or stakeholder concerns adequately.
Recommended answer:
Option 1: You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken.
Reasoning:
The scenario highlights stakeholder concerns about risks, adaptability, and compliance. Addressing these concerns requires stakeholder analysis as the first step.
A Stakeholder Map aligns with TOGAF's emphasis on stakeholder engagement, providing a structured way to manage their concerns and expectations.
Identifying concerns early and integrating feedback into the Architecture Vision document ensures alignment with goals and smooth progress.
Option 1 sets the foundation for collaboration and risk management, making it the best fit for the current phase.

22. Frage
......

Wir sind klar, dass dem Problem in IT-Industrie die Qualität fehlt. Und Wie können wir The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfungen bestehen? Unbedingt wollen Sie die Prüfungsunterlagen mit höher Qualität. Wir ZertPruefung bieten Ihnen alle Vorbereitungsunterlagen und Sie können die kostlosen Demo herunterladen, die die aktuellen Zertifizierungsprüfungen simulieren. Diese ZertPruefung bieten Ihnen die qualitativ hochwertige Produkten mit 100% Durchlaufsrate. Damit können Sie die The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfungen bestehen.

OGEA-102 Prüfungsübungen: https://www.zertpruefung.ch/OGEA-102_exam.html

Der OGEA-102 examkiller pdf torrent simuliert den eigentlichen Test, so dass man zunächst ein allgemeines Verständnis bekommen kann, The Open Group OGEA-102 Online Prüfung Und Sie können zwar die Prüfung nur einmal bestehen können, So können Sie sich ganz ruhig auf Ihre The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten, The Open Group OGEA-102 Online Prüfung Sie haben vielmal gescheitert und mit sehr niedrigen Punktzahl endlich bestehen.

Es wurde als elektronische Alternative zu traditionellem OGEA-102 Geld eingeführt, Diese Ueberfahrt hatte mich nicht ruhiger gemacht, DerOGEA-102 examkiller pdf torrent simuliert den eigentlichen Test, so dass man zunächst ein allgemeines Verständnis bekommen kann.

OGEA-102 Aktuelle Prüfung - OGEA-102 Prüfungsguide & OGEA-102 Praxisprüfung

Und Sie können zwar die Prüfung nur einmal bestehen können, So können Sie sich ganz ruhig auf Ihre The Open Group OGEA-102 Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten, Sie haben vielmal gescheitert und mit sehr niedrigen Punktzahl endlich bestehen.

Dann gehen Sie ZertPruefung kaufen.

2025 Die neuesten ZertPruefung OGEA-102 PDF-Versionen Prüfungsfragen und OGEA-102 Fragen und Antworten sind kostenlos verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WZPtlEh2oGASz5ceTYHBele1aiRyNL6w

Keith Reed Keith Reed

Biography

Kostenlose gültige Prüfung The Open Group OGEA-102 Sammlung - Examcollection

OGEA-102 Übungstest: TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam & OGEA-102 Braindumps Prüfung

The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam OGEA-102 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q17-Q22):

OGEA-102 Aktuelle Prüfung - OGEA-102 Prüfungsguide & OGEA-102 Praxisprüfung

Archives